Contact us £700K cost of each bobby on the beat
8:00pm Wednesday 2nd January 2013 in News
LANCASHIRE police is spending almost £700,000 per police officer and PCSO on the beat, it has been claimed.
New research from the Taxpayers’ Alliance has shown that on average only 11.6 per cent of officers and PCSOs in Lancashire are ‘visible and available’ to the public, compared to a national average of 11.8 per cent.
The figures, gathered using data from Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, however revealed that overall that the constabulary spent £286million a year, which works at around £77,000 per officer.
A spokesman for the Taxpayers’ Alliance said: “With spending restraint needed across the board, it is vital that police forces improve their efficiency. Crime prevention does not have to suffer.
“This report reveals figures for each police force and compares how many police officers and Police Community Support Officers are ‘visible and available’. That is the best measure of the extent to which a police force can get officers out on the beat.
“This new research shows that forces can do more to focus resources on frontline, visible policing.
“It provides a benchmark for the new Police and Crime Commissioners, who control police budgets and set the forces’ priorities.
“While much of the work done by forces that isn't visible has value, the amount of the amount of frontline visible policing for a given amount of spending is still a good proxy for value for money.
“Communities value officers on the streets and their ability to respond quickly in the event of a crime taking place.”
Comments(13)
Excluded again
says...
8:32pm Wed 2 Jan 13
Common_Sense1
says...
8:37pm Wed 2 Jan 13
english rose 1
says...
9:05pm Wed 2 Jan 13
*
Why on earth does the media take any note of such a biased group representing the super rich ?
Excluded again
says...
9:12pm Wed 2 Jan 13
Common_Sense1 wrote:'Visible to the public' is a silly argument. Is a police office interviewing a suspect or a witness in the police station not doing their job? Is a police officer infiltrating a drugs or terror gang not doing their job? Is a plainclothes detective staking out a suspect's house not doing their job? Is a police officer waiting to give evidence in court not doing their job?
I think they are saying that because they only spend around 11% of their time on the beat this multiples the figure by a factor of around 10.
happycyclist
says...
9:35pm Wed 2 Jan 13
Common_Sense1 wrote:LOL!
I think they are saying that because they only spend around 11% of their time on the beat this multiples the figure by a factor of around 10.
Info-warrior
says...
9:49pm Wed 2 Jan 13
They could scrap bobbies on the beat completely with all the surveillance tech gizmo's that have been crammed into every nook and cranny around the UK. You can't have a dump without the fear of a camera focusing in on your backdoors. Then again a kid minding his own business walking home gets beaten up in Nelson by three cowardly asian men and the Police appeal for witnesses. They charged us the tax payers a fortune to have all the CCTV cameras fitted around the country. Yet again they fail in Nelson.? Makes you wonder if the investments the politicians made on our behalf to protect us from criminals are really working at all..?
jellybiff
says...
10:35pm Wed 2 Jan 13
jimpy0
says...
11:25pm Wed 2 Jan 13
english rose 1
says...
2:09am Thu 3 Jan 13
jellybiff wrote:Explain ... Johnson House publishing ? Then again I may just google it..
Why on earth does the media take any note of such a biased group representing the super rich ?because Johnson house publishing is one of them fool.
midas
says...
8:33am Thu 3 Jan 13
english rose 1 wrote:How much public money is spent answering FOI requests made by the Taxpayers Alliance?
Maybe the LT could investigate the very wealthy individuals and shadowy groups who fund the Taxpayers Alliance to the tune of £1m a year ?! * Why on earth does the media take any note of such a biased group representing the super rich ?
halfhearted
says...
9:38am Thu 3 Jan 13
Although this is what the public want,resources are now governed by Bean Counters who have never done the job,nor do they come into contact with the public.
Departments have been formed and grown,each of them removing the officers from the view of the General Public.
Television programmes showing the work of the Police don't help either. We see on a daily basis van loads of officers breaking down doors and searching a house for a small wrap of cannabis. Is this a true reflection of their work ? I say No,but it dosn't show a proper deployment of resources.
Paperwork has and is a big problem,despite numerous promises to reduce it,I'll beg its growing by the day.
Until a proper plan of action is thought out and implemented the number of officers on the streets will reduce until there are none.
Common_Sense1
says...
10:15am Thu 3 Jan 13
Excluded again wrote:I was only explaining the difference in te figures and totally agree with you. Just because an officer doesn't put a yellow jacket on and walk the streets doesn't mean they doing any less of an important job. The ones sat behind a desk doing pointless jobs that a civilian could dongle half the price are the ones that need looking at. The total figure quoted here clearly includes equipment, cars, Maintenance costs, etc and isn't exactly a cost per bobby!
Common_Sense1 wrote:'Visible to the public' is a silly argument. Is a police office interviewing a suspect or a witness in the police station not doing their job? Is a police officer infiltrating a drugs or terror gang not doing their job? Is a plainclothes detective staking out a suspect's house not doing their job? Is a police officer waiting to give evidence in court not doing their job?
I think they are saying that because they only spend around 11% of their time on the beat this multiples the figure by a factor of around 10.
rilistic says...
8:20pm Wed 2 Jan 13