Contact us by email or phone.
£68,000 for race case footballer
A black footballer who was unfairly sacked by his former club after suffering racial victimisation has been awarded more than £68,000 following a landmark legal victory.
The sum of £68,728 handed to Mark McCammon at a remedy hearing follows the tribunal's judgment last month and includes loss of earnings and breach of contract, his solicitor, Sim Owolabi, said.
Striker McCammon, 33, brought the race victimisation case - believed to be the first of its kind against a British football club - after being dismissed for alleged misconduct last year.
The former Barbados international told a four-day hearing in Ashford, Kent, in June that he had been put "through hell" at League 2 Gillingham as he was treated differently from white players.
The club strongly denied his claims and said they were "staggered" by the judgment in his favour as they had employed thousands of staff of different races without complaint.
As part of his case, 6ft 2in McCammon said he was ordered to come into the ground amid "treacherous" winter driving conditions while some white players were not required.
The player, who signed for the Gills in 2008 on £2,500 a week, also said the club tried to "frustrate him out" by refusing to pay private medical bills to help him regain his fitness following injury. Instead, he claimed he was offered the same operation on the NHS rather than privately, a move he described as "completely out of character" for a Football League club, and that he was fined two weeks' wages when he visited a private consultant.
In contrast, the former Charlton, Swindon, Millwall and Brighton player said a white team-mate was flown to Dubai for treatment by an eminent physiotherapist at the club's expense. In a letter sent to the Professional Footballers' Association outlining his grievances, McCammon also claimed he was told not to blog while others were permitted to do so.
Dubai-based Gillingham chairman Paul Scally described McCammon's race claims as being made "maliciously and without foundation". There was no immediate comment from Gillingham but Mr Scally indicated on Thursday that they may appeal against the judgment, which he described as "bizarre".
He told BBC Radio Kent: "We're talking to lawyers this week and we'll make a decision in the next few days. It was such a bizarre, extraordinary and wrong decision, in my view, that it affected everyone in the club." He refuted claims that the club was racist, adding: "We know we are an equal opportunities employer and we know we have no issues with black people, white people or any nationality, race or creed. That's all that really matters and I think the people that love this club and support it know equally."