News RSS Feed


Adult social care cuts

3:18pm Monday 15th October 2007

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »


HUNDREDS of vulnerable people will see their care package disappear or shrink from next February - but a county council chief says those in need will not be "cut adrift".

County councillors have rubberstamped a decision to reduce the qualification level for adult social care from "moderate" to "substantial", as part of a decision which will affect households across Burnley, Pendle, Rossendale, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley.

And gateway' services, signposting people to alternative provisions in the voluntary, faith and community sectors, will not be fully up and running until September 2008.

But Coun Chris Cheetham, Lancashire's adult social care cabinet member, said: "We do recognise that people who are affected by these changes will need help.

"But we are going to help them through that process. This is not about saving money but it is about using money differently. We are not going to cut people adrift.

"In future we are not going to be seen as a major provider of care but we will be looking at providing services through the voluntary, faith and community sectors."

Social services are keen to employ the services of organisations such as Help The Aged and Age Concern to cater for people's care needs. The county council already contracts Age Concern to provide some OAP services in Preston.

Coun Cheetham says that the contracts will probably be arranged on an area-by-area basis so provisions can be tailored to local needs.

An estimated £4million will be spent on an extensive gateway' network, run by social services, which will make recommendations and give advice to people seeking alternatives to existing care packages, either via hotlines or by face-to-face support sessions at various locations.

County Hall's own surveys on the controversial changes have shown that many believe it is unfair that people, formerly entitled to social services home care, will be required to either pay for support or rely on non-statutory assistance.

Others questioned by the authority, as part of a wide-ranging consultation exercise, have voiced fears about the ability of hard-pressed charities and voluntary groups to meet the increasing care burdens of an ageing population.

Blackburn with Darwen Council has also agreed this year to reduce the level at which people qualify for elements of home care as part of a £3.3million cuts package to the adult social care budget.


Your Say YourBlackpool Citizen

Jay, Wherever you are says...
6:26pm Mon 15 Oct 07

Always the vulnerable who suffer isn't it? Like they already need kicking in the teeth more!

The trouble with voluntary organisations is that, well, they are obviously charity status and, well, underfunded at best. And if none of the OAP's live in an area which can offer it - they are stuffed basically.

It's enough that these people who are vulnerable already face burdens including emotional, health, financial ...

But just one more example of how the elderly or vulnerable get treated in the UK.

Last week it was the damning report of 90 patients left to rot in their beds in hospital in Kent.

Won't affect those making the decisions which affect so many vulnerable people's lives - no, they are far too busy earning fat salaries, on the gravy train for life!

Jay, Wherever you are says...
6:34pm Mon 15 Oct 07

Actually, I'd go as far as saying that this is 'legalised bullying' of the vulnerable. Why? Because they can't fight back as easily as abled body people can. They aren't as financially endowed to mostly, nor equipped to fight or, in some more extreme cases, even have a voice that someone listens to.

Yet it's not treated as the scandal it obviously is.

Wonder where this money is going to be redirected to ... Hmmm.

Phone advice? Hah! What next, you going to suggest 'online help for the elderly or vulnerable?'

Some faceless wonder down the phone is going to know an individual person's problems, cope with it even. Ooops, I'm being stupid here! D-oh! No, they'll be 'trained in all aspects of customer care'. Naturally.

Time LCC started treating the vulnerable and elderly as individuals NOT as a group of people seen as a 'nuisance'. Sorry, but that's the truth.

Everyone gets old or can become 'vulnerable' in life. No escaping it. Except in the case of these people making these decisions they certainly won't be going to any charity to get 'assitance'. No, they'll be living it up privately through their over inflated pensions earned whilst making decisions which affect the lives of thousands across the county.

What an utter joke!

badger, darwen says...
8:44pm Mon 15 Oct 07

endorse previous post completely,only when these faceless beuroprats have to see a family member or friend endure the treatment
the dismssive care sector gives to people who can't help themselves or 'customers or clients' as they are called now who have no one to fight their corner suffer from a lack of care will they even begin to understand the suffering they heap on patients,and yes i am speaking from bitter experience,there is better protection and laws covering the treatment of animals than is metered out by some of our so called angels who are only career minded and not caring at all.if it wasn't for the help an advice given by charities in particular age concern and help the aged our own experiences may have been even worse because the health service advice was contradictory at best and untruthfull at worst and incompetent in the extreme of the treatment of my father who lost two stone in weight whilst under observation in hospital- we were taking food in and feeding him ourselves.thankfully he is now in a care home and receiving superb care,no thanks to nhs

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »